There is no shortage of written material on community policing, and the
topic occasionally surfaces in the domain of crime analysis. But how often do
you find real focus on the role of the analyst in a community policing
program?
Of primary concern to the analyst, we suggest, would be discussion of
specific analytical, reporting, and monitoring activities which are, or could
be, performed in support of community policing.
Sgt. Mark Stallo and Lt. Wayne Slaughter of the Dallas Police Department
describe the design and implementation of a community policing effort in
Dallas, giving some attention to the role of the analyst in the process. A
forum on the roles and functions of the crime analyst in community policing
could well start with this article, perhaps focusing on questions such as the
following:
- If a neighborhood or section of the city (or county or whatever) is to
be targeted, rather than the whole area, what can the analyst do - and
how - to help determine an appropriate location? Should the crime
analyst be responsible for the inclusion of data from other domains,
such as indicators of poverty, housing stock deterioration, code
violations and the like? Alternatively, should the analyst serve on some
kind of committee, or "task force," with staff of other departments who
bring such information to the table? How does one use crime and disorder
data in the selection of a target area?
- Once an area has been designated (or the entire community), how can the
analyst provide information most useful to officers performing the
community policing functions? Is this any different from the day-to-day
analytical and reporting tasks of the analyst, and if so, in what ways?
- Presuming that some form of evaluation of the community policing
program is required, how can the analyst best serve this need?
It is understood that community policing is sometimes defined in general
terms as an overall approach to everyday police work, that it is a
"philosophy" of policing rather than a specific program. When defined in such
a way, are there implications for the way in which the crime analysis unit
goes about its tasks? Does such an outlook alter the mix of approaches and
tasks which make up the analyst's routine?