913-327-6904
from Mike Woods (5/18/01):
As I managed to sneak a few minutes to read the articles in the MACA's Round
Table, three thoughts kept bouncing up in my mind:
First, I was tremendously impressed with the articles. The subjects were
front-line topics that day-to-day analysts are always dealing with (I really
liked Don's "The Functions of Crime Analysis" and Chris' "The Uses and
Abuses of GIS", tho they were all excellent). It was refreshing to read
something that was not dryly academic and something that didn't make me feel
like I stopped higher education too soon.
Secondly, since they were topics that I feel I know something about, I found
myself nodding my head in both agreement and disagreement. I'm not talking
about disagreeing in the "you're-wrong" sense, but more along the lines of
"that's-a-good-point-but-my-perspective-is-this-and-it-is-more-valid-in-my-v
iew" sense. I think this is a much needed response from every single
analyst. Unfortunately, within many agencies crime analysis is very often
viewed as merely a job; a secure civil service position where the skills are
static. A number of analysts in these organizations wrongly feel that once
they've been to Gottlieb's or Shel Arenberg's or Raj Singh's classes they
don't need anything else. The head nodding that I experienced reading the
Round Table is an example that these subjects and this type of forum are
very important to creating and encouraging an active dialogue among analysts
to insure that the "profession" (not just the job) grows.
Lastly, but by far not the least of my feelings about what MACA has done, is
that the Round Table-type of information exchange should be strongly
encourage by every crime analyst group around the globe --- from the IACA
down to the regional groups. With the tools that technology is providing
law enforcement and the ever widening ring of accountability that is
encircling everything that police do, we analysts are sculptors of our own
fates. Crime analysis in five years is going to look much different than it
does today; our tasks tomorrow may involve skills and procedures that we can
only dream of today. It is up to us and our professional organizations, and
forums like the Round Table, to insure that the practitioners of our science
are as innovative, progressive and dynamic as those times are going to
require.
My hat's off to Don and Chris and Debra and Fran. Good start. Keep it up!
Mike Woods
Crime Analyst, UCLA Police Department
601 Westwood Plaza, LA, CA 90095-1364
310-206-7627 310-206-2058(fax)
woods@ucpd.ucla.edu
from Ramona McCall (5/14/01):
Dear Massachusetts Association of Crime Analysts (Crime Analysts' Round Table, Spring 2001),
Thank you. This is the authoritative article [by C. Bruce] I have been searching for in order to calibrate
expectations in the organization I support. I have heard more than enough from the peddlers of GIS.
Ramona McCall
GIS Support
Sr. Systems Analyst
City of Kent, Washington
253-856-4605
from Sean Bair (5/14/01):
Excellent site! Great job. I'll refer analysts to it often.
Sincerely,
Sean M. Bair, Director of Operations
Bair Software Research & Consulting
sean@bairsoftware.com
www.bairsoftware.com
720-348-1090 phone
720-348-1093 fax
from Michelle Arneson (5/14/01):
Just wanted to say that I think the Roundtable is a great idea. I printed
off three of the articles to keep in my files and I look forward to more.
Even though I've been here over three years (since this position was
created), I still very much struggle to find exactly what my role is, how to
deal with a very poor cad/rms system, etc. There are very few crime analysts
in this state, much less "role model" C.A. units to lean on. I was fortunate
on a trip to Washington, DC, to visit two nearby departments and their
units. The most valuable lesson I learned is that even though these
departments are much, much larger with many more staff and other resources,
they still struggled with many of the same issues that I do, being a sole
analyst. Not to criticize the other depts, but it certainly helped boost my
"self-esteem." I felt that I did a good job at what I did, but didn't feel
confident that I was (am) doing what I should be. I am not a true "crime
analyst." As I know many others find, I have become a computer expert (which
we certainly lack here) - some for my own means (creating databases,
spreadsheets, etc) and much for other means (website development, training
others on using the software, etc.). My main point is, any good help I can
get to give me more direction is welcome. I really liked the site and will
return for more.
Thanks again!!
Michelle Arneson, Crime Analyst
Green Bay Police Department
Phone: (920) 448-3249
Fax: (920) 448-3256
www.gbpolice.org